Wave Music Home
ReleasesCommunityYour OrderWave Music
ArtistsEventsDJ MixesShop

Wave Music Home


Home
About Us
Labels
Distributed Labels
Links




Search


Adv. Search



Subscribe


Email






Go Back   Wave Music Community Board > Tech Talk for Gearheads

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-02-2012, 07:11 AM
man_traic man_traic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 254
New mixer time - help me make up my mind!!!

I currently have a modified UREI 1620LE (One of the rec outs is post-FX and the headphones have a third, middle position thats a mix of CUE/PGM)
Heres my criteria -

- Rotary
- 19" rackable
- High quality
- At least 6 inputs

Heres my choices:


Alpha Recording System ARS 4100
Pros: Compact, nice dual FX loop, high quality, uncluttered
Cons: Expensive, no warranty (!), Rec outs arent post-FX, Cueing system is too basic


Electronique Spectacle DJR100D/ DJR100*
Pros: Definitive. Has a VU and iso, so can replace all that gear with one, high quality.
Cons: Bit cluttered with the per channel EQ, cant hear master in phones, no recording outs, no Dry/ wet FX knob
* The 100 has no per-channel EQ or iso. Contender?


Rane MP2016A
Pros: Excellent in/out connections, pre AND post FX recording outs, excellent cue system, high quality
Cons: Arguably a bit cluttered, no Dry/ Wet FX knob (So cant retire my E&S XFX3004 Isolator)

I thought about others:
Xone V6+ second hand (Too cluttered, too expensive)
New Bozak (How good is this? Ticks a lot of boxes but unsure...)
Modified old Bozak (Too risky, too expensive)
DFA Mixer (Still no info on it, so not sure...)

What do you guys think?

Last edited by man_traic : 12-02-2012 at 07:15 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-02-2012, 10:57 AM
Laurin Laurin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 472
Alpha Recording System ARS 4100
__________________
Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-02-2012, 03:12 PM
daswadan daswadan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: germany
Posts: 27
why do you want to get rid of the urei? if we know the reason, maybe its easier to help you with the selection of your new mixer.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-02-2012, 03:52 PM
man_traic man_traic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 254
It needs some repairs (left xlr outputs are louder, one balance pot is broken, one of the channels is blown) and im thinking of changing

alsoi the mixer is too noisy
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-02-2012, 04:21 PM
Mistick Krewe Mistick Krewe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: hoodoo audio heaven
Posts: 1,404
wow, did the issues crop up over time, or suddenly?

no warranty? or local competent techs?

are you handy with an iron?

if it's sorted out prior to being offered for sale,
I'm sure the proceeds would better help fund your next acquisition....
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-02-2012, 04:33 PM
man_traic man_traic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 254
Left XLR = been there 5 years
Balance pot - 2 years
Blown channel - 1 year (I threw a line level into the third (Phono) channel and for some reason it blew the line channel also WTF)

Ive had my UREI about 6 years

Yes there is a competent tech I know, but im thinking of selling it as is for a low price of 150/200 for quick sale
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-02-2012, 05:34 PM
bossa nolyx bossa nolyx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 211
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laurin
Alpha Recording System ARS 4100
One more voice on that unit!


And if there's enough space in it, try to get 4 fitting ALPS RK40 from this reseller..

These pots have much better feeling than the RK27 and do not wear out

Last edited by bossa nolyx : 12-02-2012 at 05:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-02-2012, 05:37 PM
misterharrison misterharrison is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 185
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laurin
Alpha Recording System ARS 4100
And another, based purely on looks!

Out of interest, does anyone know if it's a discrete design? I've never read anything about the internals...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-02-2012, 05:41 PM
misterharrison misterharrison is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 185
Quote:
Originally Posted by bossa nolyx
And if there's enough space in it, try to get 4 fitting ALPS RK40 from this reseller..

These pots have much better feeling than the RK27 and do not wear out
I think you can only get those in a linear taper now, though.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-02-2012, 06:18 PM
bossa nolyx bossa nolyx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 211
Yes, only linear taper is available.

But I installed 6 of them in my PM5000 and I would never go back to the RK27.

And I love the volume curve of rotary faders with linear taper
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-03-2012, 06:13 AM
misterharrison misterharrison is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 185
Quote:
Originally Posted by bossa nolyx
Yes, only linear taper is available.
But I installed 6 of them in my PM5000 and I would never go back to the RK27.
And I love the volume curve of rotary faders with linear taper
Interesting. I wonder how it feels? I guess the signal starts kicking in pretty quickly in the lower part of the sweep, but then progresses more smoothly thereafter?

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-03-2012, 08:48 AM
bossa nolyx bossa nolyx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 211
Yes,

normally it should give you about 6dB attenuation from 5 down to 12 (clock), the rest happens below 12. So I normally mix the signal in by turning up to about 10 and then have about 210 rotation angle to mix very very smoothly.

On a log taper rotary fader the first 120 or more are more or less useless because of the low dynamics in most electronic music. Fine mixing happens mostly in the range of 30-60 rotation angle of the pot. With linear taper I can use much more.


BUT it could be another thing on mixers without input gain and sources with very different level. Never tried this you yet...
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-03-2012, 01:13 PM
Laurin Laurin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 472
Quote:
Originally Posted by misterharrison
And another, based purely on looks!

Out of interest, does anyone know if it's a discrete design? I've never read anything about the internals...



Had the Mixer for 2 weeks for testing in my dungeon lab.
Compared it in that time to 1620LE and original, Xone S6, DJR400 +++

Would love to buy it, but I did not have the money for another 19" mixer sitting around.
__________________
Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-03-2012, 01:31 PM
misterharrison misterharrison is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 185
So you had it in your lab for two weeks and never popped the lid?
I've never seen a photo of its insides, nor a comment on its circuit topology.
Perhaps it's full of little green men?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-03-2012, 03:59 PM
Mistick Krewe Mistick Krewe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: hoodoo audio heaven
Posts: 1,404
benefit of the doubt,
perhaps the manufacturer had seals in place to prevent inspection;
ie..... you break the seal, you buy the unit....
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-03-2012, 09:01 PM
Fred Bissnette Fred Bissnette is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: toronto ontario canada
Posts: 1,123
i love the rane it feels nice and sounds boss on a big rig
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-04-2012, 02:07 PM
Laurin Laurin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 472
Just ask ARS about some pics, they are really nice guys.
Had a lot of fun talking to them.

Really open minded about mods and they did not want more money for most of the mods.
__________________
Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-05-2012, 11:03 AM
paul1979 paul1979 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Dublin,Ireland
Posts: 56
Quote:
Originally Posted by misterharrison
And another, based purely on looks!

Out of interest, does anyone know if it's a discrete design? I've never read anything about the internals...


was thinking the same myself, assumed it was due to high price, emailed the dealer in london, who did not know, said they would get back to me, havent heard anything yet

has anyone compared ARS to vintage Bozak?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-06-2012, 02:08 AM
manny manny is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Posts: 375
Rane MP2016A
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-06-2012, 05:34 AM
Mehdi Mehdi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 30
ARS is an IC based Mixer, so are there Isolators and EQs, clean sounding tho.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 12-06-2012, 05:35 AM
bossa nolyx bossa nolyx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 211
Do you really think that a console is better in that it is set up discretely?

I have the Bozak Iso-X here and promise you that this thing has taken me all the magic of discrete design. It sounds really bad (especially for its price). And that can be measured too.

I've heard the ARS and can say whether discrete or not, the thing has by far the best phono sound I've ever heard in a DJ mixer. Sound through the line inputs is imo as good as other very good brands and a bit of an issue of taste.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-06-2012, 07:05 AM
Mehdi Mehdi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 30
Yes I heard that the Bozak Iso has very high distortion, I don't think its designed very well.
I think Discrete circuits sound different, it really depends on the design and what you like sound wise.
IC's sound good too, A B test is the only real decider, blind folded even .
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-06-2012, 09:11 AM
Rotary Dreams Rotary Dreams is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Glyfada, Athens , Greece
Posts: 156
sdx 3700
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12-06-2012, 10:10 AM
Pern Pern is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Landskrona, Sweden
Posts: 350
Interesting that the Bozak ISO have High Distortion. When looking at the main PCB it looks like the filters use simple Discrete buffers and i assumed that these was high quality FET based ones (Like Toshiba 2Sk170).
__________________
My Rotary Mixer Projects:

www.Bozure.com

On Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12-06-2012, 12:47 PM
misterharrison misterharrison is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 185
Quote:
Originally Posted by bossa nolyx
Do you really think that a console is better in that it is set up discretely?
No idea, really!
I just know that people respect the (original) Bozak for it's warm sound, which exists at least partly because of its discrete topology. I might be wrong (and I'm talking about something I have no knowledge about really), but I believe it's easier to design a discrete circuit that doesn't mess with a signal's phase than an IC circuit. Sorry, I've done far too much background reading without any hands-on experience at all!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.0.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
2006 Wave Music


© Wave Entertainment Group, Inc.